Who Really Cares? wrote:OK hard to tell as you often see people saying they want so and so out of gaming for nothing more than fan boy reasons
Yeah, but I've never partook in such nonsensical tripe, have I? I play games, not labels. The only "war" that had any passion was Sega versus Nintendo and that was just flat out fun, even the marketing team back then had fun with it. Now it's an electronic giants versus another, it's all corporate and dry. If one seriously finds that to be passion inducing, they should reevaluate their definition of fun.
Who Really Cares? wrote:they would be in a position where they could try and treat us how ever they like
Except for the fact that Microsoft and only Microsoft has been treating it as so for years now due to a small United States lead. It's no surprise that the lead vanished. Perhaps people got tired of paying for quadruple overpriced hard drives when the main competitor allows any to be inserted. Or the fact that the play and charge kit 3/4 times doesn't work out of the box, meanwhile I've never heard of a PS3's controller loosing charge life. Or the horrible first party mic's, both wireless and wired, when any decent bluetooth could be used elsewhere. Maybe they were put off by a $100+ wireless adapter early on. Or the fact that most people have been through a handful of the consoles alone. Seriously, that's the act of a company who already thinks they have no competitor, it's horrible. Funny thing? We've seen this before but from Sony. They thought it'd sell based on the name alone, yet we all know how that went. It took years to reverse that misfortune.
Now, with that said, like yourself I too believe XBL is worth it. However I don't think it will be for much longer. I said it in the previous post, I've had it for close to ten years and was one of the original supporters. Like yourself, I'd rather pay for a good online service than use one in shambles. I've said this to so many of my pals who refuse to hop on the 360 bandwagon. I prefer the PS3 as a console, though despise it's network. I don't deprive myself of superior net play and ports. When it comes to fighting games, most ran better on the 360 both architecturally and network wise, plus it's easier to network. The online component is cohesive, it's easy to add a new user, check their history, invite to a party and chat it up, etc. PSN still doesn't support cross game chat, it's ages behind and dead out of the gate in comparison.
So there you have it, I too have enjoyed the 360 despite all of this thanks to XBL. Problem is, the PS4 looks to make current XBL look dated upon arrival. With that, a free or even similarly priced model would immediately entice and wipe away the single stronghold Microsoft's platform has had. This is why I say E-3 is going to be very important, if Sony continues to impress Microsoft will have a serious problem. On the other hand, I'm more than eager to see what Microsoft does have to show. I think the problem this generation is that instead of topping each other, each manufacturer tried to have what the other had. It didn't work, it just wasted our time. With that said, the ball is in Microsoft's court. Sony's network model was seriously impressive, so only one of two things can happen. They can blow us away with creativity thus holding their position or they can continue with this facade of a stronghold and turn the educated consumer away. I'm legitimately interested, hopefully we have two major manufacturers putting out quality models and hardware this generation. If not, I'll likely only be getting one out of the gate, unless some unpassable software seriously warrants otherwise. That's a stretch, though, especially early on.