Page 1 of 2

Blatant paedo is blatant

PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:38 pm
by QWERTY
Image

What do you think?

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... tread.html

I'm surprised it hasn't cropped up earlier tbh. Dirty fucker invited little kiddywinks onto his 'Jim'll Fix It' show to sit on his knee while he fixed it for them to go to Disneyworld/drive a choo choo train/suck his cock. He also defended Gary Glitter saying 'he did nothing wrong' and calling child porn just 'dodgy films'.

Re: Blatant paedo is blatant

PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 12:44 pm
by St. Elmo's Fire
I got banned from commenting on Yahoo! articles when I brought this topic up on a story about his death. There was always been something dodgy about him, for sure.

Re: Blatant paedo is blatant

PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:08 pm
by Peter
Always hated that man. Sounds like he certainly fixed a lot of things.

Re: Blatant paedo is blatant

PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:37 pm
by Yokosuka Martian
What is he known for?

Re: Blatant paedo is blatant

PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 3:52 pm
by AnimeGamer183
patio? o_O

Re: Blatant paedo is blatant

PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 4:04 pm
by Bluecast
John Lennon is alive!?

Re: Blatant paedo is blatant

PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 4:51 pm
by Crimson Ryan
Yokosuka Martian wrote: What is he known for?

TV shows working with kids. Sort of like a 'Make a Wish' kinda thing.

Re: Blatant paedo is blatant

PostPosted: Tue Oct 02, 2012 6:12 pm
by redline
i dont like the idea jimmy savile being branded a paedo because i thought he was a good person.. but if he did abuse those kids i think its really sad. ](*,)

--- edited :-# ---- seems he abused 10 girls, so the evidence is overwhelming


(its interesting to note there has been many people who would be classified as paedos today, like charlie chaplin etc for sleeping with quite young girls)

Re: Blatant paedo is blatant

PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 10:08 am
by QWERTY
Jimmy Saville had a substantial hoard of jewellery. Apparently he loved nothing more than squeezing his fingers into a couple of tight rings.

Re: Blatant paedo is blatant

PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 11:16 am
by Riku Rose
Heard some rumors about 2 years ago. Shame the guy isn't alive so he can suffer for this shit. It's a shame Gary Glitter seems to have disappeared I looked forward to hearing about him getting a thump in the street every week.

Re: Blatant paedo is blatant

PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 11:33 am
by QWERTY
I think the one thing that most surprises me is that he wasn't a faggot. Most males who share eccentricity on his level usually transpire to be ordained in the church of fudge. I suppose they're similar levels of perversion though.

It's hilarious how Esther Rantzen has now come out and given her two-penneth-worth:

Esther Rantzen wrote:“For the first time there’s more than one single child complaining. There are five adult women producing very similar statements about the way they were attacked. You see, one child’s word against the word of a television icon, one who was renowned for raising money for charity, who knew everyone from the Prime Minister to Princess Diana, who was knighted by the Queen and the Pope, I think no single complainant dared speak out before. There were always rumours that he behaved very inappropriately, sexually, with children.”


You shoulda fucking spoke up at the time you stupid trans gender-alike bint!

Image

Re: Blatant paedo is blatant

PostPosted: Wed Oct 03, 2012 2:23 pm
by Bluecast
This guy and Jerry Sandusky are going to be roommates pretty soon in hell.

He raped 48 kids.

Image

Re: Blatant paedo is blatant

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 4:55 pm
by Martin
The BBC News channel just
displayed images of the three
women who claimed that Jimmy
Savile interfered with them
sexually. They showed a current
picture of each of the women
and a picture taken of each of
them from the 1970s.
The caption read: Now, then.
Now, then. Now, then.


:rotflmao:

Re: Blatant paedo is blatant

PostPosted: Thu Oct 04, 2012 5:06 pm
by St. Elmo's Fire
:D

"Jim'll Touch It" would have been more apt...

Re: Blatant paedo is blatant

PostPosted: Mon Oct 08, 2012 9:18 am
by Who Really Cares?
Image