I can understand your apprehension based on the experiences you've had in the past. The fact of the matter is that if the staff fail, it's down to Yama to fix it before the site goes down the toilet, which he is now doing Great Flood style (fresh, clean slate etc).south carmain wrote:Neo Matrix wrote:south carmain wrote:So, you're really saying you don't have any confidence in any of the staff and administrators at all even after their words in the threads over the last few hours?
yes, I'm saying this situation has happened before and even if staff are motivated it could happen again, promises have been made and broken, no offense to yama or anyone else but if they do happen to disregard responsibilities for whatever reasons or side with the culprit for whatever reasons like with ryudo then this system would allow the community to get rid of the mod anyway, it would be a security measure but would need a strict amount of rules to function fairly without being abused, of course I'm willing to give faith in yama and see how it goes but I really think this system could function if this were to happen again
the point of my argument is that if the staff fail us then the website is fucked
The main issue we're disagreeing on is "democracy on an internet forum" and whether staff issues should be aired out in public. I don't think it works, while you think it might, simple as that.
If you had 2 options who were equally matched, wouldn't you have the slight leaning towards the one you liked more?Riku Rose wrote:A few people seem to be talking like this will come into effect but I just want to see if people think it will work.
Honestly I wouldn't vote for my favorite members but more people who I think would be good at the job. Just looking at the Dojo awards we seem to all be of a similar mindset on what we think about people.
