MiTT3NZ wrote: I miss McClane's receding hairline...
Who Really Cares? wrote: Die Hard - a building
Die Hard 2 - an airport
Die Hard 3 - a city
Die Hard 4 - east coast
Die Hard 5 - everything?
QWERTY™ wrote: 4.0 was crap simply for "yipee kai ay mother*******"
Fuck off, Hollywood. This shit started as 18, so keep it the same. Stop chasing the buck and make Die Hard how it should be; full of violence and swearing (if needs be). This whole numbing of 80s franchises by studios to draw as many consumers and maximisation of profits is really starting to fuck me off.
Crimson Ryan wrote:That's not Die Hard. That could be any film with a different name!
Die Hard is about regular cop, John McClaine, trapped in a building outnumbered by terrorists using his wits to battle them one by one and keep other people safe.
Kenny wrote: They did but it was dubbed in pretty bad. Same with the gore and violence.
Would've been much better if they shot an R rated film THEN edit the shit out for a PG-13 theatrical release and then release it genuinely uncut for the home media market.
OL wrote:Crimson Ryan wrote:That's not Die Hard. That could be any film with a different name!
Die Hard is about regular cop, John McClaine, trapped in a building outnumbered by terrorists using his wits to battle them one by one and keep other people safe.
I agree that it should be more about McClane outwitting the badguys, but the rest of that is why John McTiernan didn't want to come back for Die Hard 2. The script was just the same as the first, but in an airport. He wanted to do something different, which is why when he came back for 3, it was a totally different kind of setup.
I don't mind seeing McClane in different situations, myself. It's more fun than just rehashing the same old thing.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
Powered by phpBB © 2000-