south carmain wrote: wait people didn't ironically vote kiba as funniest member?
Nope, I was quite legit
south carmain wrote: wait people didn't ironically vote kiba as funniest member?
south carmain wrote: wait people didn't ironically vote kiba as funniest member?
Yokosuka Martian wrote:That's quite interesting. I'm curious who thought I was funny LOL
Rakim wrote:Yokosuka Martian wrote:That's quite interesting. I'm curious who thought I was funny LOL
It was me. I guess I was alone in finding you funny .
Regardless, my ballot did pretty good in the end. You and Thief are my only horses who didn't place well.
Spokane wrote:AnimeGamer183 wrote: I think this year has made me realize that the dojo awards are lame as fuck.
The lamest comment in the whole thread. Even more than my and Mitts bickering.
AnimeGamer183 wrote:
I just dont really like the generalization and categorization of some of our members. The negative categories kinda kill the whole thing. I never really cared about the awards anyway, but this year was particularly dull. As for you and mitts bickering, thats like trying to make sense of 2 drunk irish-american guys from boston arguing at the bar about sports.
south carmain wrote: lol at "coby"
AnimeGamer183 wrote:Spokane wrote:AnimeGamer183 wrote: I think this year has made me realize that the dojo awards are lame as fuck.
The lamest comment in the whole thread. Even more than my and Mitts bickering.
I just dont really like the generalization and categorization of some of our members. The negative categories kinda kill the whole thing.
MiTT3NZ wrote: Spokes, there's a general rule you'll find in the Ts&Cs of any competition. Any involved with the running of said competition, indeed also those directly related to any of these people are exempt from receiving any prize of any sort. Now, I don't have a direct link that can prove this, but it is in fact law in both our respective countries.
If you'd like though, I can take to Google and find it. Either way, are you honestly telling me that you'd be willing to break the law, thus becoming a criminal for the sake of $20 worth of PSN points? I always thought you were a good, upstanding citizen, as do many. Not only would this put you in a compromising position in terms of law and respect, but it would also negate any and all of the votes you received to become runner-up in the category.
Is it really worth it, Spokes?
Gingefners, The wrote:MiTT3NZ wrote: Spokes, there's a general rule you'll find in the Ts&Cs of any competition. Any involved with the running of said competition, indeed also those directly related to any of these people are exempt from receiving any prize of any sort. Now, I don't have a direct link that can prove this, but it is in fact law in both our respective countries.
If you'd like though, I can take to Google and find it. Either way, are you honestly telling me that you'd be willing to break the law, thus becoming a criminal for the sake of $20 worth of PSN points? I always thought you were a good, upstanding citizen, as do many. Not only would this put you in a compromising position in terms of law and respect, but it would also negate any and all of the votes you received to become runner-up in the category.
Is it really worth it, Spokes?
The last raffle I was at was very interesting because the people that ran the raffle actually won it! So its not unusual for that to happen now and again.
But seriously... This competition is a sham and a fraud and a sham wow.
Gingefners, The wrote: The last raffle I was at was very interesting because the people that ran the raffle actually won it! So its not unusual for that to happen now and again.
But seriously... This competition is a sham and a fraud and a sham.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
Powered by phpBB © 2000-