shredingskin wrote:
Now you're putting even less effort into your posts. A couple of well-considered sentences, in lieu of this video made by someone else, would go a long way.
shredingskin wrote:
shredingskin wrote: I've already pointed what I thought of the demo. Most the reviews are basically "it's not terrible, but it's not good".
You should play an actual good platformer game, maybe you just forgot.
Maybe Mario ?? Apparently the new one is pretty damn great, some say GOTY.
Henry Spencer wrote: Looks like thin corridors like the standard 3D Sonic games are nowadays. I'd prefer more open levels like we got in the first two Adventure games. Say what you will about the Adventure games but I think they had the right idea, just not great execution most of the time. Also, the art style is really bland to me now, Sonic used to have such trippy art direction like in the 2D Sonic games, is there no way they can translate that to the 3D entries? Would help make me not think it's just more of the Sonic Unleashed style art direction (which is boring).
KidMarine wrote: I'm so conflicted. I don't think Forces looks very good, but when I see lazy shit ignorant posts like shredingskin's I want to buy a copy out of spite.
Sonikku wrote:BB is selling it for $25 on the 24th. Its value is already dropping like a rock.
King John Blaze wrote: Should have just made it a racing game. Still would have been crap but would have been better than this garbage and made a lot more sense.
Thief wrote: Sonic games probably get underrated from critics because of bias expectation, just like mario probably gets overrated because of bias expectation. Sonic Forces is probably an alright game by the looks of it. Whatever.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
Powered by phpBB © 2000-