OL wrote:Really?
You don't know why it reminds you of that?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Figure_of_speech
OL wrote:Really?
You don't know why it reminds you of that?
Bluecast wrote:Never got why they felt like they needed to remake a remake. The 1982 remake is excellent and still holds up. The 1950's film has it's charm still.
Kenny wrote:[Hollywood] just wants to make more bang for their buck by cranking out proven films from the past. It's safer than blowing millions on an experiment and not getting the investment back.
Kenny wrote:Bluecast wrote:Never got why they felt like they needed to remake a remake. The 1982 remake is excellent and still holds up. The 1950's film has it's charm still.Kenny wrote:[Hollywood] just wants to make more bang for their buck by cranking out proven films from the past. It's safer than blowing millions on an experiment and not getting the investment back.
Inbreeding is going to keep on happening even if its unnecessary. But I thought this one was a prequel?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest
Powered by phpBB © 2000-